My websites were always targeted primarily for the hardcore fans who almost know it all. The purpose of my sites was too shine light on some very obscure interviews and facts that aren't accessible in well known books or extras that are still available for purchase. However, times change, and new generations and fans come along - and I realized that a lot of my audience consist of fans who aren't diehards who know every book and interview by memory for decades (like all the fans at the Terminator Files Forum years ago), or just never went outside the films. So this is part of a different type of FAQ section, for those less initiated in Cameronverse.
Let's continue with "Does The Endoarm Differ In Both Films?"
Yes. It's in fact, the only redesign done to the original endoskeleton. The knuckles and joints are different. With the advancement of technology, Stan Winston and his team redesign the knuckles because the original hand could not move realistically with the joints it had. And it did look a bit clunky and required a redesign.
Stan Winston Cinefex Magazine, August 1991
Richard Landon from Stan Winston Studios, Fangoria #107, October 1991 Magazine,
John Rosengrant of Stan Winston Studios, it's current chairman, in an interview with JamesCameronOnline 2009
We're all used to the fine tuned T2 endoarm because all those great (and some not so great) replicas and all the endoskeleton figures have the T2 arms (aside from one Japanese figure from 1985), but when put next to the original hand, which worked in the dark and quick or blurry cuts, it does make the original one look crude and it was definitely one and only area that needed fine tuning. Below, comparison of the original prop and the T2 redesign that's much more known to the world. The focus here are the knuckles and joints.
Back to Terminator Trilogy